Showing posts with label S and P 500. Show all posts
Showing posts with label S and P 500. Show all posts

Saturday, April 17, 2010

An Issue of Trust

Who can you trust with your money? 
If you ask the individual investor, the answer is "no one."  Not after the likes of Bernard Madoff, Allen Sanford and, now, Goldman Sachs, the crown jewel of investment banks.  So, if you follow the thinking of the individual investor by measuring "Investor Sentiment," you would have drastically cut back in stock investments in December, 2008, and you would not have returned to the stock market yet. 
In other words, you would have sold near the market low.  No wonder Warren Buffett cautions, "Be greedy when others are fearful; be fearful when others are greedy."
I follow a proprietary investment model that measures twenty one economic indicators.  I've built this model over a period of over twenty years, and use it exclusively for two purposes:
  1. It is my model, and I use only data from apolitical, independent sources for analysis.  That keeps me protected from data that may have been skewed by someone who has a vested interest in whether I choose to invest or not;
  2. It removes all emotion from investment decisions.  If it says that I should be 70% invested, I'm 70% invested.  No panic.  No euphoria.  No need to trust anyone but me.
 When I invested money for other people, it was an invaluable tool.  If my clients wanted to sell low, I showed them that they were doing just that.  If they wanted to buy high, again, I showed them that was a less than stellar strategy.
Discussing each indicator, and how it relates to the overall decision was the subject of a semester's work in an advanced class at UCLA for professional financial planners who chose an emphasis in investment.  Mostly geeks.  I will, however, discuss one part of this analysis, Investor Sentiment, and tie that discussion to the general feeling of mistrust that is currently pervasive with the individual investor.
If you had followed Investor Sentiment as discussed above, you would have sold when the S and P 500 was at 888.61.  It is now at 1192.13.  As reflected above, you'd have sold low and, if you buy back in, it will undoubtedly be higher. 
If, on the other hand, you would have read Investor Sentiment as a negative indicator, i.e., you did the opposite of what it suggested, you would have enjoyed a 34% increase.   Hmmm.  I'm reminded of what my grandmother said when I based my plea to do something on, "Everybody else is doing it."  Her familiar response was, "If everybody jumped off a cliff, would you do it, too?"
So, now we have both Warren Buffett and my sweet little Meema advising us to think for ourselves, and even consider doing the opposite of what others are doing.  In the particular case of the last market correction, that would have been good advice.  But, does it hold true most of the time?
As it turns out, yes.  Investor Sentiment is the most predictive of all twenty one of my indicators, if you do the opposite of what it says to do.  And, I will add, that the stock market is nowhere near the bargain it was in March, 2008, when its cost (P/E)  was about its long term average of $15.82 for every dollar of S and P 500 earnings, but even though the market has come back 75% from its low (25% lower than its high), the individual investor is still not buying.
Back to trust.  Yes, Bernie Madoff is a thief.  Yes, Allen Sanford appears to have bilked thousands of investors out of their money, touting "safe" international CDs.  Yes, it looks like Goldman Sachs took both sides of the bet that the housing bubble would burst.  But does that mean you should keep your money in the bank?  Let's take a look at how that will work for you in the long term.
The best rate I could find for a two and one-half year insured CD was 2.1%.  To calculate your "real return," that is, your return after inflation and taxes, subtract from that 2.1% the current inflation rate, or 2.1%.  Now you're at zero, but you still have to pay taxes on your interest.  For most people,  your marginal tax rate is about 16%.  16% tax on 3% is .48.  So, tax of .48 plus inflation of 2.1 is 2.58.  2.1 - 2.58 = -.48  You're losing about 1/2% annually.
If you're a woman with $100,000 that must last you for 30 years, at that rate, this money will produce about $3100 per year.  On the other hand, if you were to invest in the stock market, using its long term average return of 9%, this money will produce about $9,700 per year.
We live longer.  Inflation hits us harder.  We can put our money in "safe" investments that are guaranteed to lose money over the long term, or we can listen to Warren Buffett and my sweet little Meema.
The choice is yours.

Wednesday, April 7, 2010

The Best Investor 2010 - First Quarter Results

Last January, I posed the question that buying shares in the S and P 500 may be just as effective as following professionals' stock market picks.  Some women who are participating in the Self-Invested Women Pilot Program are considering whether they are passive (people who buy an index, like the S and P 500) or active (people who buy individual stocks or types of stocks, like energy and health care) investors.  This may help you make that decision.
The S and P 500 Index
This index allows investors to buy 75% of the publicly traded companies in the US, many of which derive a significant part of their income outside the country.  While there are many indexes (Dow Jones Industrial, the Russell 2000, the Wilshire 5000), the S and P 500 is the index against which the vast majority of money managers measure their performance.
The Challenge
Last September, ten investment strategists gave their recommendations for which sectors of the market would outperform the total market in 2010 in Barron's magazine.  We chose six of these strategists, representing US Trust, Citigroup, JP Morgan, BlackRock, Deutsche Bank and Goldman Sachs.  We'll compare the S and P 500 index performance against the sectors recommended by each investment professional, assuming you were to invest equally in all sectors.
Fees
It requires no management fee to invest in an index like the S and P 500.  Investment advisers' fees range from 2% to 5%.  We'll use the lower figure, 2%, for this comparison, and deduct 1/2% every quarter from the recommendations by the advisers. 
Since there are trading costs for both individuals and money managers, we'll consider this a "wash."
Long Term Investing
We'll assume that we're in the stock market for long term investing, not short term "trading."  Therefore, one quarter's data is insufficient to make this decision.  We'll look at this performance all year, and discuss how relevant this little experiment is to your long term strategy.
First Quarter Performance
S and P 500
S and P 500 was up 6.04% in the first quarter this year.
US Trust
Technology + 10.45%
Materials + 6.89%
Energy + 5.04%
Industrials + 4.77%
Weighted Average performance +6.7875%, less 1/2% fee = +6.2875%
US Trust's recommendations beat the S and P 500 by about a quarter of one percent in the first quarter.
Citigroup
Materials + 6.89%
Financials - 3.68%
Software + 10.45%
Energy + 5.04%
Weighted Average performance + 4.675%, less 1/2% fee = +4.175%
Citigroup's recommendations lagged the S and P 500 by about 1.87% the first quarter.
JP Morgan
Energy + 5.04%
Industrials + 4.77%
Financials  - 3.68%
Technology + 10.45%
Materials + 6.89%
Weighted Average performance + 6.166%, less 1/2% fee = +5.666%.
JP Morgan's recommendations lagged the S and P 500 by about 3/8 of one percent in the first quarter.
BlackRock
Energy + 5.04%
Health Care + 8.53%
Weighted Average performance + 6.785%, less 1/2% fee = + 6.285%.
BlackRock beat the S and P 500 by just under 1/4 of one percent in the first quarter.
Deutsche Bank
Technology + 10.45%
Health Care + 8.53%
Energy + 5.04%
Industrials + 4.77%
Weighted Average performance + 7.1975%, less 1/2% fee = +6.6975%.
Deutsche Bank beat the S and P 500 by 3/4 of one percent in the first quarter.
Goldman Sachs
Energy + 5.04%
Materials + 6.89%
Financials - 3.68%
Technology + 10.45%
Weighted Average performance + 4.675%, less 1/2% fee = 4.175%.
Goldman Sachs lagged the S and P 500 by 1.865% in the first quarter.
Summary
So far this year, three underperformed the S and P 500 and three lagged behind its performance, with Deutsche Bank doing best, and Goldman worst.
Last year, only Deutsche Bank and JP Morgan beat the averages, and four lagged behind.
Another update after the second quarter.
We'd love to hear your thoughts.  Are you an active or passive investor - and why?

Monday, January 4, 2010

Sizing Up the Competition

We're going head to head with stock market pros this year, by comparing the results of buying the S and P 500 Index with that of professional investment strategists.  In order to compare track records, let's look at how they did last year.  All initial recommendations were taken from Barron's Magazine December 22, 2008 (and changes to portfolios were published as of September 7, 2009, and calculated as of September 30, 2009).

What Happened Last Year

S and P 500 Ended the Year at 1115.10
S and P Earnings were $55.91
Fed Funds Rate was .25%
10 Year Treasury was 3.85%
Best Performing Sectors were: 
Technology (59.92%), Materials (45.23%), and Consumer Discretonary (38.76%)
If you'd bought the Index, you'd have been up 23.45% for the year.

What the Pros Predicted

Black Rock (Robert Doll)
S and P 500 - 1050 (5.8% low)
S and P Earnings - $57.5 (3% high)
Fed Funds Rate - 1% (300% high)
10 Year Treasury - 3.25% (16% low)
Best Performing Sectors: Technology (49.47%), Energy (11.29%), and Health Care (17.07%).
Sold Technology in the 4th quarter.
Portfolio return 25.94%

Deutche Bank Private Wealth (Larry Adam)
S and P 500 - 1025 (8% low)
S and P 500 Earnings - $71 (27% high)
Fed Funds Rate - .125% (50% low)
10 Year Treasury - 2.75% (29% low)
Best Performing Sectors:  Technology (59.92%), Consumer Staples (11.2%) and Health Care (17.07%)
Sold Consumer Staples in 4th quarter, and replaced with Energy and Industrials. 
Portfolio return 32.4%

JP Morgan (Thomas Lee)
S and P 500 - 1100 (1% low)
S and P 500 Earnings - $65 (16% high)
Fed Funds Rate - 0% (was .25%)
10 Year Treasury - 1.65% (57% low)
Best Performing Sectors:  Financials (14.8%), Consumer Discretionary (38.76%) and Health Care (17.07%).  Sold Consumer Discretionary and Health Care in 4th quarter and replaced with Energy, Technology, Industrials and Materials.
Portfolio return - 28.04%

US Trust (Christopher Hyzy)
S and P 500 - 1020 (8.5% low)
S and P Earnings - $60 (4% high)
Fed Funds Rate - .5% (50% high)
10 Year Treasury - 3% (22% low)
Best Performing Sectors:  Energy (11.29%), Consumer Staples (11.2%), Utilities (6.8%), Technology (59.92%).  Sold Consumer Staples, Utilities, and replaced with Industrials and Materials.
Portfolio return - 22.64%

Citigroup (Tobias Levkovich)
S and P 500 - 1000 (10% low)
S and P Earnings - $62 (10.8% high)
Fed Funds Rate - 0% (was .25%)
10 Year Treasury - 3% (22% high)
Best Performing Sectors:  Technology (59.92%), Financials (14.8%), Consumer Discretionary (39.76%), Telecom Services (2.63%), Health Care (17.07%) and Industrials (17.27%).  Sold Consumer Discretionary, Telecom Services, Health Care, and bought Materials and Energy.
Portfolio return - 23.26%

Goldman Sachs (David Kostin)
S and P 500 - 1100 (1% low)
S and P Earnings $53 (5% low)
Fed Funds Rate - .125% (50% low)
10 Year Treasury - 3.6% (6% low)
Best Performing Sectors:  Consumer Staples (11.2%) and Health Care (17.07%).  Sold both and replaced with Energy, Materials, Financials and Technology)
Portfolio return - 20.35%

Commission and Taxes

Do-it-yourself investors typically pay about .5% in annual fees, and full service brokers typically charge about 2% for their services.

Short-term capital gain tax rates are the same as ordinary income tax rates, which are 25% for most people (who earn between $33,950 and $82,250 per year).  We'll ignore the tax effect on the relatively low (1.94%) dividend rate on both the index and its sectors in this comparison.
Using these assumptions to adjust the returns:

S and P 500 Index - 23.45% - .5% commission = 22.95% net return
Black Rock - 25.94% - 2% commission - 3.25% capital gain taxes = 20.69% net return
Deutche Bank Private Wealth - 32.4% - 2% commission - .58% capital gain taxes = 29.8% net return
JP Morgan - 28.04% - 2% commission - 1.42% capital gain taxes = 24.62% net return
US Trust - 22.64% - 2% commission - .5% capital gain taxes - 20.14%
Citigroup - 23.26% - 2% commission - 1.61% capital gain taxes = 19.65%
Goldman Sachs - 20.35% - 2% commission - 1.94% capital gain taxes = 16.41%

In 2009, 1/3 of the pros listed beat the S and P 500 net return with their recommendations for investing, and you can see for yourself how each predicted the other investing categories for the year.  

Congratulations if you followed the advice of Deutche Bank Private Wealth or JP Morgan last year.  I suspect, however, that Deutche Bank Private Wealth charges higher than 2% for its advice, but we'll keep the figures consistent for comparison purposes.

If you followed the other 2/3, you'd have been better off just buying the S and P 500 Index.  It will be interesting to see if Deutche Bank and JP Morgan will continue to outperform, and whether the others will improve their performance in 2010.

Saturday, January 2, 2010

Who's Smarter, the Pros or the Little Guy?

Last September, I published the 2010 investment advice given by several market professionals and posed the question,
"What would earn you the most money,
  • Buying the entire S and P 500 Index or 
  • Buying just the sectors of that Index that the market pros suggest?"
Buying the S and P 500 Index would initially cost you a commission, but since you would to pay for no advice, you could pay under $10 commission at a deep discount broker like ScotTrade or ETrade. 

Taking the advice of the market pros would cost you a much higher fee, because
  1. You'd need, not only to know what to buy, but also when to sell. 
  2. You pay a commission when buying and selling, and must pay capital gain taxes on any gain on your gain on sale, unless you buy in a tax-deferred retirement account.
  3. Then, you pay an additional commission when replacing the sold securities with another investment.
So, here's our little 2010 experiment.  We're going to track how much you'd make by just buying the index (consisting of Energy, Materials, Industrials, Consumer Discretionary, Consumer Staples, Health Care, Financials, Information Technology, Telecom Services and Utilities) versus buying just the sectors in that index recommended by the pros.  Here's where we'll start:

Who,
What Sector, Price


Kitty,
S and P 500, 1115.10
                                            
Black Rock,
Energy, 429.95
Health Care, 362.22
                                                          
Deutche Bank Private Wealth Mgmt   
Technology, 370.71
Health Care, 362.22
Industrials, 242.99

Morgan Stanley                          
Health Care, 362.22
Technology, 370.71
Energy, 429.95

Prudential 
Financials, 193.78                                
Technology, 370.71
Material, 199.81
Industrials, 242.99

US Trust                                        
Technology, 370.71
 Materials,199.81
,Energy, 429.95
Industrials, 242.99

Barclays Capital                      
Industrials, 242.99
Technology. 370.71

Citigroup                                     
Materials, 199.81
Financials, 193.78
Technology, 370.71
Energy, 429.95

Goldman Sachs                         
Energy, 429.95
Materials, 199.81
Financials, 193.78
Technology, 370.71

JPMorgan/Chase                     
Energy, 429.95
Industrials, 242.99
Financials, 193.78
Technology, 370.71
Materials, 199.81


RBC Capital Mkts                     
Technology, 370.71
Consumer Discretionary, 235.07
Financials, 193.78
Industrials, 242.99

I'll give you an update at the end of every calendar quarter.  What do you think?  Will trading make you more money than just buying the Index?

It will be an interesting experiment, and one that just may result in you taking charge of your investments yourself.

Friday, October 9, 2009

It's Up! It's Down! It's Cheap! It's Expensive!

If you listen to the business news, a myriad of market pundits are shouting,
  • "Beware!  The market has gotten ahead of itself!"
  • "If you don't get in now, you'll miss this upturn!"
  • "The market is getting very expensive here!"
  • "The market is historically very cheap!"
  • "Buy gold!"
Who's right?

Well, as always, I think the best judge of that is you.  All you need is some information, and you're likely to make a much better decision with your money than anyone who has an agenda.

I.  What do we mean when we say "the market?"

Many of you have heard of the Dow Jones Industrial Average, often called the "Dow."  The Dow is thirty companies (3M, AT&T, Alcoa, American Express, B of A, Boeing, Caterpillar, Chevron, Cisco, Coke, Disney, DuPont, Exxon, GE, HP, Home Depot, IBM, Johnson & Johnson, Kraft, McDonalds, Merck, Microsoft, JP Morgan, Pfizer, P&G, Travelers, United Tech, Verizon and Wal-Mart.)  Since there are about 5000 publicly traded companies, so this is a rather small snapshot.

A much better measurement of the market is the Standard & Poor's 500 (S&P 500), which are 500 large publicly traded stocks, most of which are based in the US.  Let's use this much broader index when we refer to the market.

II.  What is a P/E?

A P/E is a fraction which consists of
  • The Price of the index as the numerator, and
  • The Earnings for that index as the denominator. 
The S& P 500 index is now trading at 1067.59.  That's the P.  It is projected (by Standard & Poor's) to earn $69.20 next year.  That's the E.  1067.59 divided by 69.20 is 15.42.  The P/E of the market is 15.42.  That means that for every dollar the market earns, you are paying $15.42 when you buy the index at this price.

Last year, the P/E was 28.37.  The market was trading at 1099.23, and it earned $38.74 over the last twelve months.  The market is cheaper than it was last year, but you knew that. 

The real question is what is a "normal" P/E?  The historic long term average for the S&P 500 is 15.82.  So, this index is cheaper than its long term average.

III.  The Market is Ahead of Itself

Let's see if people who say this are right.  At its low last March, the S&P 500 traded at 666.79.  It is now
  • Up 60% from its low of 666.79 last March, and
  • Down 30% from its high of 1564.74 in October, 2007
It's trading very near a "normal" P/E of 15.82.  People who think the market is ahead of itself think that times are not normal.  We have a huge deficit.  We have high unemployment.  We are coming out of the worst recession since the Great Depression.

These people may be right, except for one thing.  The market is a discounting mechanism.  That means it is priced for events about 6 - 9 months in the future.

Do you think things are getting better?  Do you think we're on the road to economic recovery?  If so, the market may be fairly priced (but not the bargain in was in March).  If not, you probably think it's come too far too fast.  Your opinion is as good as any.

IV.  If you don't get in now, you'll miss this upturn.

If the best reason you can give for doing something now is that prices will go to the moon if you don't, then you're using the same reasoning that people used to buy Internet stocks in the late 1990's and houses in this decade.  It's not a good reason to buy.

V.  Buy gold

Gold is, historically, a TERRIBLE investment.  What it is, however, is a hedge, and insurance policy against disaster.  If currencies lose value (like our dollar has in the recent economic meltdown), people rush to gold as an internationally accepted commodity. 

If you think the US economy is going to hell in a hand basket, buy gold.  Otherwise, it's ridiculously expensive (an all time hight of $1050 per ounce), and is much more likely to go down over the long term than it is to go up.

So, there you have it.  You have all the information you need to be a pundit.  Draw your conclusions based on the facts, and act accordingly.

Tuesday, September 8, 2009

How Much Will YOU Earn?

As I mentioned six days ago http://womensfinancialplanning.blogspot.com/2009/09/is-stock-market-cheap.html , I look to Standard & Poor's for earnings projections. I had mentioned that, in the next twelve months, projections for S&P 500 earnings are $48.67. Note that the next twelve months are September, 2009 - August, 2010.

Last Saturday, Barron's magazine published projections for 2010 by ten strategists, who charge dearly for their advice. These projections are for January, 2010 - December, 2010. Let's take a look.

I. Next Year's Earnings for the S&P 500

Since I'm writing this column, I'll go first.
  1. Standard & Poor's projects S&P 500 earnings to be $72.99 in 2010.
  2. The optimist of the Barron's group is Prudential International, which predicts $80 - 9.6% more than S&P.
  3. Three (BlackRock, Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan Chase) predict $75 - 2.75% more than the S&P.
  4. Two strategists (Deutsche Bank Private Wealth Management and Morgan Stanley Investment Management) predict $72 - 1.4% less than S&P.
  5. US Trust projects $70.50, and and RBC Capital Markets, $70 (about 3.5% - 4%) less than S&P.
  6. Citigroup predicts $68 - 6.8% less than S&P.
  7. Gloomy Barclay's Capital? $60 - almost 18% less than S&P.

So, one of the statistical methods you may have slept through in Stats Class, was to throw out the highest and lowest numbers and average the rest. Doing so gives us $72.19 - 1% difference between S&P's projection and that of esteemed (and expensive) strategists. That's not much.

II. The S&P 500 Index - Left Alone vs. Sliced Up

If you buy the S&P 500 Index, it looks like this:

  • Technology - 18.6%
  • Financials - 15%
  • Health Care - 13.5%
  • Energy - 11.7%
  • Consumer Staples - 11.6%
  • Industrial - 10%
  • Consumer Discretionary - 9.1%
  • Utilities - 3.8%
  • Materials - 3.4%
  • Telecommunications - 3.2%

Our esteemed strategists, on the other hand, want you to buy individual sectors of the index that look like this

  • Technology - 22.2% (3.6% more than the index)
  • Energy - 19.4% (7.7% more than the index)
  • Materials - 19.4% (7.7% more than the index)
  • Industrial - 16.7% (6.7% more than the index)
  • Financials - 13.9% (1.1% less than the index)
  • Health Care - 5.5% (8% less than the index)
  • Consumer Discretionary 2.8% (6.3% less than the index).

They don't want you to buy any

  • Consumer Staples (11.6% of the index)
  • Utilities (3.8% of the index), or
  • Telecommunications (3.2% of the index)

III. The Cost of Buying the S&P 500 Index vs A La Carte

So, basically, this is the deal. You'll be paying a big fat fee to strategists in order to slice up the sectors of the S&P 500, ignoring about 20% of it, and whittling the remaining 80% + up or down by an average of about 5%. They're suggesting that, by doing this, you will see earnings increases on your investments of an average of about 24.5% - less their big fat fee.

You'll pay nothing to me to recommend the S&P, which is predicting earnings increases of 34.5%. And neither S&P nor I care whether you buy or not.

Strategists, on the other hand, stake their livelihood on whether you pay them for their opinion.

Which do YOU think is the better deal? Just for fun, let's keep track of the difference between buying the S&P 500 index in 2010, and doing what strategists suggests throughout 2010. Then, we'll subtract their average big fat fee from their returns and nothing from mine, and see who wins.

It's one woman versus ten men. I'm comfortable with those odds.